Card details, tags, similarity scores, and printings.
Instant
Put target creature on top of its owner's library. If that creature is red, you may put it on the bottom of its owner's library instead.
$0.24
Log in to save cards to your lists.
Start a deck with this cardCard attributes are distinct from inferred themes. AI themes and predicted tags are suggestions, not rules text; check the card before relying on a surprising classification.
Showing 1–24 of 34,604 candidates
These rankings describe text and metadata resemblance, not synergy, win rates, or claims that a card counters yours.
Score 0.459unitless formula ranking
Shared traits: No shared tags
No shared tags contributed to this comparison.
Score 0.464unitless formula ranking
Shared traits: No shared tags
No shared tags contributed to this comparison.
Score 0.465unitless formula ranking
Shared traits: No shared tags
No shared tags contributed to this comparison.
Score 0.466unitless formula ranking
Shared traits: No shared tags
No shared tags contributed to this comparison.
Score 0.466unitless formula ranking
Shared traits: No shared tags
No shared tags contributed to this comparison.
Score 0.466unitless formula ranking
Shared traits: No shared tags
No shared tags contributed to this comparison.
Score 0.468unitless formula ranking
Shared traits: No shared tags
No shared tags contributed to this comparison.
Score 0.469unitless formula ranking
Shared traits: No shared tags
No shared tags contributed to this comparison.
Score 0.469unitless formula ranking
Shared traits: No shared tags
No shared tags contributed to this comparison.
Score 0.470unitless formula ranking
Shared traits: No shared tags
No shared tags contributed to this comparison.
Score 0.470unitless formula ranking
Shared traits: No shared tags
No shared tags contributed to this comparison.
Score 0.472unitless formula ranking
Shared traits: No shared tags
No shared tags contributed to this comparison.
Score 0.473unitless formula ranking
Shared traits: No shared tags
No shared tags contributed to this comparison.
Score 0.473unitless formula ranking
Shared traits: No shared tags
No shared tags contributed to this comparison.
Score 0.473unitless formula ranking
Shared traits: No shared tags
No shared tags contributed to this comparison.
Score 0.474unitless formula ranking
Shared traits: No shared tags
No shared tags contributed to this comparison.
Score 0.474unitless formula ranking
Shared traits: No shared tags
No shared tags contributed to this comparison.
Score 0.474unitless formula ranking
Shared traits: No shared tags
No shared tags contributed to this comparison.
Score 0.475unitless formula ranking
Shared traits: No shared tags
No shared tags contributed to this comparison.
Score 0.475unitless formula ranking
Shared traits: No shared tags
No shared tags contributed to this comparison.
Score 0.475unitless formula ranking
Shared traits: No shared tags
No shared tags contributed to this comparison.
Score 0.476unitless formula ranking
Shared traits: No shared tags
No shared tags contributed to this comparison.
Score 0.476unitless formula ranking
Shared traits: No shared tags
No shared tags contributed to this comparison.
Score 0.476unitless formula ranking
Shared traits: No shared tags
No shared tags contributed to this comparison.
Balanced: 0.60*text + 0.20*tags + 0.10*color + 0.10*cost. Outputs are unitless rankings, not percentages or probabilities. Most similar shows the highest scores; Typical overlap is nearest the catalog median (0.556); Least similar shows the lowest scores.
Text uses cosine resemblance (−1 to 1) between 384-number embeddings when available, or lexical fallback otherwise. Tags use Jaccard overlap of approved tags and AI themes, excluding predicted tags and separately scored color/cost tags. Color compares W/U/B/R/G identity. Mana cost combines mana-value proximity, 1 / (1 + the difference), with mana-symbol overlap. Tags, color, and cost range from 0 to 1.
Model: bge-small-en-v1.5. 34,605 of 34,605 catalog cards currently have embeddings.
Showing 1 of 1 candidates
1,031 of 34,605 canonical cards have AI-derived resource labels. Label model: gpt-5.6-luna.
These suggestions use AI-derived resource labels, which may be incomplete or outdated. They are not rules-validated interactions.
1 directional matches
Synergy candidates compare resources Ether Well is labeled as providing with candidate payoffs, and candidate resources with Ether Well's payoffs. Candidates are excluded when either card is labeled as hating a resource the other provides or has a payoff for.
Each distinct resource and direction counts once. Highest counts rank first, with ties ordered by card slug. No deck legality or color filter is applied. Check costs, timing, restrictions, and the cards themselves; these are not probabilities or guaranteed counters.
No matching candidates found.
1,031 of 34,605 canonical cards have AI-derived resource labels. Label model: gpt-5.6-luna.
These suggestions use AI-derived resource labels, which may be incomplete or outdated. They are not rules-validated interactions.
This card has resource labels, but no answer matches were found.
Answer candidates are labeled as disrupting a resource Ether Well provides or has a payoff for; the direction is candidate disrupts the viewed card.
Each distinct resource and direction counts once. Highest counts rank first, with ties ordered by card slug. No deck legality or color filter is applied. Check costs, timing, restrictions, and the cards themselves; these are not probabilities or guaranteed counters.
| Set | Language | Collector | Released | Rarity | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mirage | de | 65 | 1996-10-08 | uncommon | — |
| Mirage | en | 65 | 1996-10-08 | uncommon | $0.24 |
| Mirage | fr | 65 | 1996-10-08 | uncommon | — |
| Mirage | pt | 65 | 1996-10-08 | uncommon | — |
| Mirage | it | 65 | 1996-10-08 | uncommon | — |
| Mirage | ja | 65 | 1996-10-08 | uncommon | — |
| Mirage | es | 65 | 1996-10-08 | uncommon | — |